Korea, Rep. vs Spain: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Korea, Rep.
3
in 2018
Spain
3
in 2018
Korea, Rep. rank
1st
Spain rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Korea, Rep.
  • Spain
0123180019092018

How they compare

Korea, Rep. currently reports 3 against 3 in Spain, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 67 shared years of data; in 1948 it was Korea, Rep. ahead.

Korea, Rep. ranks 1st and Spain ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Korea, Rep. averaged higher in 4 and Spain in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Korea, Rep. Spain Difference Ahead
1940s 1 0 1 Korea, Rep.
1950s 1 0 1 Korea, Rep.
1960s 2.4 0 2.4 Korea, Rep.
1970s 1.57 0.8571 0.7143 Korea, Rep.
1980s 1.22 3 1.78 Spain
1990s 2.2 3 0.8 Spain
2000s 3 3 0
2010s 3 3 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Korea, Rep. or Spain?
Korea, Rep., at 3 against 3 in Spain as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Korea, Rep. and Spain?
0, with Korea, Rep. ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Korea, Rep. and Spain?
67 years are reported by both, from 1948 to 2018.
How do Korea, Rep. and Spain rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Korea, Rep. ranks 1st and Spain ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).