South Korea vs Moldova: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
South Korea
3
in 2018
Moldova
3
in 2018
South Korea rank
1st
Moldova rank
1st
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- South Korea
- Moldova
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 3 against 3 in Moldova, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 70 shared years of data; in 1948 it was Moldova ahead.
South Korea ranks 1st and Moldova ranks 1st of 167 countries.
South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 2.4 | 1 | 1.4 | South Korea |
| 1970s | 1.4 | 1 | 0.4 | South Korea |
| 1980s | 1.22 | 1 | 0.2222 | South Korea |
| 1990s | 2.2 | 2 | 0.2 | South Korea |
| 2000s | 3 | 2.9 | 0.1 | South Korea |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, South Korea or Moldova?
- South Korea, at 3 against 3 in Moldova as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between South Korea and Moldova?
- 0, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Moldova?
- 70 years are reported by both, from 1948 to 2018.
- How do South Korea and Moldova rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- South Korea ranks 1st and Moldova ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).