South Korea vs Lithuania: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
South Korea
3
in 2018
Lithuania
3
in 2018
South Korea rank
1st
Lithuania rank
1st
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- South Korea
- Lithuania
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 3 against 3 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 70 shared years of data; in 1948 it was Lithuania ahead.
South Korea ranks 1st and Lithuania ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, South Korea averaged higher in 3 and Lithuania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 2.4 | 1 | 1.4 | South Korea |
| 1970s | 1.4 | 1 | 0.4 | South Korea |
| 1980s | 1.22 | 1 | 0.2222 | South Korea |
| 1990s | 2.2 | 2.9 | 0.7 | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, South Korea or Lithuania?
- South Korea, at 3 against 3 in Lithuania as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between South Korea and Lithuania?
- 0, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Lithuania?
- 70 years are reported by both, from 1948 to 2018.
- How do South Korea and Lithuania rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- South Korea ranks 1st and Lithuania ranks 1st of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).