Kenya vs Poland: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Kenya
3
in 2018
Poland
3
in 2018
Kenya rank
1st
Poland rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Kenya
  • Poland
0123191819682018

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 3 against 3 in Poland, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 56 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Kenya ahead.

Kenya ranks 1st and Poland ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya Poland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4286 1 0.5714 Poland
1970s 1 1 0
1980s 1 1.1 0.1 Poland
1990s 1.3 2.9 1.6 Poland
2000s 2.6 3 0.4 Poland
2010s 2.67 3 0.3333 Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Kenya or Poland?
Kenya, at 3 against 3 in Poland as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Kenya and Poland?
0, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Poland?
56 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2018.
How do Kenya and Poland rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Kenya ranks 1st and Poland ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).