Jordan vs Oman: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Jordan
1
in 2018
Oman
1
in 2018
Jordan rank
117th
Oman rank
117th

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Jordan
  • Oman
00.511.52180019092018

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 1 against 1 in Oman, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 73 shared years of data; in 1946 it was Oman ahead.

Jordan ranks 117th and Oman ranks 117th of 166 countries.

Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Oman Difference Ahead
1940s 1 1 0 β€”
1950s 1.1 1 0.1 Jordan
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Jordan or Oman?
Jordan, at 1 against 1 in Oman as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Jordan and Oman?
0, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Oman?
73 years are reported by both, from 1946 to 2018.
How do Jordan and Oman rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Jordan ranks 117th and Oman ranks 117th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).