India vs Philippines: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

India
3
in 2018
Philippines
3
in 2018
India rank
1st
Philippines rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • India
  • Philippines
11.522.53193519762018

How they compare

India currently reports 3 against 3 in Philippines, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1952 it was Philippines ahead.

India ranks 1st and Philippines ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, India averaged higher in 2 and Philippines in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Philippines Difference Ahead
1950s 2 3 1 Philippines
1960s 2.3 3 0.7 Philippines
1970s 3 1.4 1.6 India
1980s 3 1.67 1.33 India
1990s 3 3 0
2000s 3 3 0
2010s 3 3 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, India or Philippines?
India, at 3 against 3 in Philippines as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between India and Philippines?
0, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Philippines?
66 years are reported by both, from 1952 to 2018.
How do India and Philippines rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
India ranks 1st and Philippines ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).