Hungary vs Spain: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Hungary
3
in 2018
Spain
3
in 2018
Hungary rank
1st
Spain rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Hungary
  • Spain
0123180019092018

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 3 against 3 in Spain, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 136 shared years of data; in 1867 it was Spain ahead.

Hungary ranks 1st and Spain ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Across the 16 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 4 and Spain in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Spain Difference Ahead
1860s 1 1 0 β€”
1870s 1 1 0 β€”
1880s 1 1 0 β€”
1890s 1 1 0 β€”
1900s 1 2 1 Spain
1910s 0.8889 2 1.11 Spain
1920s 0 0.6 0.6 Spain
1930s 0 2.67 2.67 Spain
1940s 0.3333 0 0.3333 Hungary
1950s 1 0 1 Hungary
1960s 1 0 1 Hungary
1970s 1 0.8571 0.1429 Hungary
1980s 1.11 3 1.89 Spain
1990s 3 3 0 β€”
2000s 3 3 0 β€”
2010s 3 3 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Hungary or Spain?
Hungary, at 3 against 3 in Spain as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Hungary and Spain?
0, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Spain?
136 years are reported by both, from 1867 to 2018.
How do Hungary and Spain rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Hungary ranks 1st and Spain ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).