Guyana vs Romania: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Guyana
3
in 2018
Romania
3
in 2018
Guyana rank
1st
Romania rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Guyana
  • Romania
0123185919382018

How they compare

Guyana currently reports 3 against 3 in Romania, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Romania ahead.

Guyana ranks 1st and Romania ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guyana Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 2.6 2.4 0.2 Guyana
2000s 3 3 0 β€”
2010s 3 3 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Guyana or Romania?
Guyana, at 3 against 3 in Romania as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Guyana and Romania?
0, with Guyana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Romania?
52 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2018.
How do Guyana and Romania rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Guyana ranks 1st and Romania ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).