Greece vs Montenegro: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Greece
3
in 2018
Montenegro
3
in 2018
Greece rank
1st
Montenegro rank
1st
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Greece
- Montenegro
How they compare
Greece currently reports 3 against 3 in Montenegro, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 87 shared years of data; in 1921 it was Greece ahead.
Greece ranks 1st and Montenegro ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Greece has averaged higher in every one of the 10 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greece | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 2 | 1 | 1 | Greece |
| 1930s | 2.5 | 1 | 1.5 | Greece |
| 1940s | 2.67 | 1 | 1.67 | Greece |
| 1950s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Greece |
| 1960s | 2.1 | 1 | 1.1 | Greece |
| 1970s | 1.67 | 1 | 0.6667 | Greece |
| 1980s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Greece |
| 1990s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Greece |
| 2000s | 3 | 2.4 | 0.6 | Greece |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Greece or Montenegro?
- Greece, at 3 against 3 in Montenegro as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Greece and Montenegro?
- 0, with Greece ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Montenegro?
- 87 years are reported by both, from 1921 to 2018.
- How do Greece and Montenegro rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Greece ranks 1st and Montenegro ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).