Greece vs India: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Greece
3
in 2018
India
3
in 2018
Greece rank
1st
India rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Greece
  • India
0123182719222018

How they compare

Greece currently reports 3 against 3 in India, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 66 shared years of data; in 1952 it was Greece ahead.

Greece ranks 1st and India ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Greece averaged higher in 1 and India in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greece India Difference Ahead
1950s 3 2 1 Greece
1960s 2.1 2.3 0.2 India
1970s 1.67 3 1.33 India
1980s 3 3 0 β€”
1990s 3 3 0 β€”
2000s 3 3 0 β€”
2010s 3 3 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Greece or India?
Greece, at 3 against 3 in India as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Greece and India?
0, with Greece ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and India?
66 years are reported by both, from 1952 to 2018.
How do Greece and India rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Greece ranks 1st and India ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).