Greece vs Hungary: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Greece
3
in 2018
Hungary
3
in 2018
Greece rank
1st
Hungary rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Greece
  • Hungary
0123182719222018

How they compare

Greece currently reports 3 against 3 in Hungary, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 136 shared years of data; in 1867 it was Greece ahead.

Greece ranks 1st and Hungary ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Greece has averaged higher in every one of the 16 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greece Hungary Difference Ahead
1860s 3 1 2 Greece
1870s 3 1 2 Greece
1880s 3 1 2 Greece
1890s 3 1 2 Greece
1900s 3 1 2 Greece
1910s 2.83 1 1.83 Greece
1920s 2 0 2 Greece
1930s 2.2 0 2.2 Greece
1940s 2.33 0.6667 1.67 Greece
1950s 3 1 2 Greece
1960s 2.1 1 1.1 Greece
1970s 1.67 1 0.6667 Greece
1980s 3 1.11 1.89 Greece
1990s 3 3 0
2000s 3 3 0
2010s 3 3 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Greece or Hungary?
Greece, at 3 against 3 in Hungary as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Greece and Hungary?
0, with Greece ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Hungary?
136 years are reported by both, from 1867 to 2018.
How do Greece and Hungary rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Greece ranks 1st and Hungary ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).