Germany vs Lithuania: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Germany
3
in 2018
Lithuania
3
in 2018
Germany rank
1st
Lithuania rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Germany
  • Lithuania
11.522.53187119442018

How they compare

Germany currently reports 3 against 3 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1919 it was Lithuania ahead.

Germany ranks 1st and Lithuania ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Germany Lithuania Difference Ahead
1910s 3 3 0 β€”
1920s 3 2.5 0.5 Germany
1930s 1.6 1 0.6 Germany
1940s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 3 2.9 0.1 Germany
2000s 3 3 0 β€”
2010s 3 3 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Germany or Lithuania?
Germany, at 3 against 3 in Lithuania as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Germany and Lithuania?
0, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Lithuania?
53 years are reported by both, from 1919 to 2018.
How do Germany and Lithuania rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Germany ranks 1st and Lithuania ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).