France vs Philippines: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
France
3
in 2018
Philippines
3
in 2018
France rank
1st
Philippines rank
1st
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- France
- Philippines
How they compare
France currently reports 3 against 3 in Philippines, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 76 shared years of data; in 1935 it was Philippines ahead.
France ranks 1st and Philippines ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Across the 9 decades both report, France averaged higher in 2 and Philippines in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 2.6 | 3 | 0.4 | Philippines |
| 1960s | 2.5 | 3 | 0.5 | Philippines |
| 1970s | 3 | 1.4 | 1.6 | France |
| 1980s | 3 | 1.67 | 1.33 | France |
| 1990s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, France or Philippines?
- France, at 3 against 3 in Philippines as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between France and Philippines?
- 0, with France ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and Philippines?
- 76 years are reported by both, from 1935 to 2018.
- How do France and Philippines rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- France ranks 1st and Philippines ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).