Eswatini vs Kuwait: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Eswatini
1
in 2018
Kuwait
1
in 2018
Eswatini rank
117th
Kuwait rank
117th

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Eswatini
  • Kuwait
00.20.40.60.81196319902018

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 1 against 1 in Kuwait, a difference of 0.

Across all 50 years both countries report, Kuwait has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 117th and Kuwait ranks 117th of 166 countries.

Kuwait has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Kuwait Difference Ahead
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 0.8889 1 0.1111 Kuwait
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Eswatini or Kuwait?
Eswatini, at 1 against 1 in Kuwait as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Eswatini and Kuwait?
0, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Kuwait?
50 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2018.
How do Eswatini and Kuwait rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Eswatini ranks 117th and Kuwait ranks 117th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).