Equatorial Guinea vs Libya: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Equatorial Guinea
0
in 2018
Libya
0
in 2010
Equatorial Guinea rank
150th
Libya rank
150th

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Libya
00.511.52195119842018

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0 against 0 in Libya, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 43 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 150th and Libya ranks 150th of 166 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Libya Difference Ahead
1960s 1 0.5 0.5 Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0 0 0 β€”
2000s 0 0 0 β€”
2010s 0 0 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Equatorial Guinea or Libya?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0 against 0 in Libya as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Equatorial Guinea and Libya?
0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Libya?
43 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2010.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Libya rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 150th and Libya ranks 150th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).