Ecuador vs Nepal: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Ecuador
3
in 2018
Nepal
3
in 2018
Ecuador rank
1st
Nepal rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Ecuador
  • Nepal
0123180019092018

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 3 against 3 in Nepal, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 185 shared years of data; in 1830 it was Nepal ahead.

Ecuador ranks 1st and Nepal ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Across the 19 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 10 and Nepal in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Nepal Difference Ahead
1830s 0 1 1 Nepal
1840s 0 0.6 0.6 Nepal
1850s 0 0 0 β€”
1860s 0 0 0 β€”
1870s 0 0 0 β€”
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0.9 0 0.9 Ecuador
1910s 1 0 1 Ecuador
1920s 0.5 0 0.5 Ecuador
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0.4 0 0.4 Ecuador
1950s 2 1.12 0.875 Ecuador
1960s 1.5 1 0.5 Ecuador
1970s 0.9 1 0.1 Nepal
1980s 3 1.9 1.1 Ecuador
1990s 3 2 1 Ecuador
2000s 2.4 1.6 0.8 Ecuador
2010s 3 2.11 0.8889 Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Ecuador or Nepal?
Ecuador, at 3 against 3 in Nepal as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Ecuador and Nepal?
0, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Nepal?
185 years are reported by both, from 1830 to 2018.
How do Ecuador and Nepal rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Ecuador ranks 1st and Nepal ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).