Ecuador vs Mongolia: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Ecuador
3
in 2018
Mongolia
3
in 2018
Ecuador rank
1st
Mongolia rank
1st
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Ecuador
- Mongolia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 3 against 3 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 93 shared years of data; in 1924 it was Mongolia ahead.
Ecuador ranks 1st and Mongolia ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Across the 10 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 4 and Mongolia in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0.1667 | 1 | 0.8333 | Mongolia |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Mongolia |
| 1940s | 0.4 | 1 | 0.6 | Mongolia |
| 1950s | 2 | 1 | 1 | Ecuador |
| 1960s | 1.5 | 1 | 0.5 | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 0.9 | 1 | 0.1 | Mongolia |
| 1980s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 3 | 2.8 | 0.2 | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 2.4 | 3 | 0.6 | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Ecuador or Mongolia?
- Ecuador, at 3 against 3 in Mongolia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Ecuador and Mongolia?
- 0, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mongolia?
- 93 years are reported by both, from 1924 to 2018.
- How do Ecuador and Mongolia rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Ecuador ranks 1st and Mongolia ranks 1st of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).