Denmark vs Poland: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Denmark
3
in 2018
Poland
3
in 2018
Denmark rank
1st
Poland rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Denmark
  • Poland
11.522.53180019092018

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 3 against 3 in Poland, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 93 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Poland ahead.

Denmark ranks 1st and Poland ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Poland Difference Ahead
1910s 3 3 0
1920s 3 2.2 0.8 Denmark
1930s 3 1 2 Denmark
1940s 3 1 2 Denmark
1950s 3 1 2 Denmark
1960s 3 1 2 Denmark
1970s 3 1 2 Denmark
1980s 3 1.1 1.9 Denmark
1990s 3 2.9 0.1 Denmark
2000s 3 3 0
2010s 3 3 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Denmark or Poland?
Denmark, at 3 against 3 in Poland as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Denmark and Poland?
0, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Poland?
93 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2018.
How do Denmark and Poland rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Denmark ranks 1st and Poland ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).