Denmark vs India: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Denmark
3
in 2018
India
3
in 2018
Denmark rank
1st
India rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Denmark
  • India
11.522.53180019092018

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 3 against 3 in India, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 67 shared years of data; in 1952 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 1st and India ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark India Difference Ahead
1950s 3 2 1 Denmark
1960s 3 2.3 0.7 Denmark
1970s 3 3 0 β€”
1980s 3 3 0 β€”
1990s 3 3 0 β€”
2000s 3 3 0 β€”
2010s 3 3 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Denmark or India?
Denmark, at 3 against 3 in India as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Denmark and India?
0, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and India?
67 years are reported by both, from 1952 to 2018.
How do Denmark and India rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Denmark ranks 1st and India ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).