Czechia vs Honduras: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Czechia
3
in 2018
Honduras
3
in 2018
Czechia rank
1st
Honduras rank
1st
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Czechia
- Honduras
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 3 against 3 in Honduras, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 88 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Honduras ahead.
Czechia ranks 1st and Honduras ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 6 and Honduras in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 3 | 2.5 | 0.5 | Czechia |
| 1940s | 1.5 | 1 | 0.5 | Czechia |
| 1950s | 1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | Czechia |
| 1960s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Czechia |
| 1970s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Czechia |
| 1980s | 1.12 | 2 | 0.875 | Honduras |
| 1990s | 2.7 | 2.1 | 0.6 | Czechia |
| 2000s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Czechia or Honduras?
- Czechia, at 3 against 3 in Honduras as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Czechia and Honduras?
- 0, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Honduras?
- 88 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2018.
- How do Czechia and Honduras rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Czechia ranks 1st and Honduras ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).