Cuba vs Morocco: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Cuba
1
in 2018
Morocco
1
in 2018
Cuba rank
117th
Morocco rank
117th

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Cuba
  • Morocco
0123180019092018

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 1 against 1 in Morocco, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 70 shared years of data; in 1902 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 117th and Morocco ranks 117th of 166 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Morocco in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Morocco Difference Ahead
1900s 3 1 2 Cuba
1910s 3 1 2 Cuba
1950s 1 1 0
1960s 0 1 1 Morocco
1970s 0 1 1 Morocco
1980s 0 1 1 Morocco
1990s 0 1 1 Morocco
2000s 0.4 1 0.6 Morocco
2010s 1 1 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Cuba or Morocco?
Cuba, at 1 against 1 in Morocco as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Cuba and Morocco?
0, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Morocco?
70 years are reported by both, from 1902 to 2018.
How do Cuba and Morocco rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Cuba ranks 117th and Morocco ranks 117th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).