Cuba vs Jordan: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Cuba
1
in 2018
Jordan
1
in 2018
Cuba rank
117th
Jordan rank
117th
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Cuba
- Jordan
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 1 against 1 in Jordan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 68 shared years of data; in 1946 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 117th and Jordan ranks 117th of 166 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Jordan in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Cuba |
| 1950s | 1.67 | 1.17 | 0.5 | Cuba |
| 1960s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jordan |
| 1970s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jordan |
| 1980s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jordan |
| 1990s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jordan |
| 2000s | 0.4 | 1 | 0.6 | Jordan |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Cuba or Jordan?
- Cuba, at 1 against 1 in Jordan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Cuba and Jordan?
- 0, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Jordan?
- 68 years are reported by both, from 1946 to 2018.
- How do Cuba and Jordan rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Cuba ranks 117th and Jordan ranks 117th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).