Croatia vs Mexico: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Croatia
3
in 2018
Mexico
3
in 2018
Croatia rank
1st
Mexico rank
1st
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Croatia
- Mexico
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 3 against 3 in Mexico, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 89 shared years of data; in 1921 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 1st and Mexico ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Across the 10 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 1 | 0.6667 | 0.3333 | Croatia |
| 1930s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1.56 | 0.5556 | Mexico |
| 2000s | 2.5 | 3 | 0.5 | Mexico |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Croatia or Mexico?
- Croatia, at 3 against 3 in Mexico as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Croatia and Mexico?
- 0, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Mexico?
- 89 years are reported by both, from 1921 to 2018.
- How do Croatia and Mexico rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Croatia ranks 1st and Mexico ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).