Croatia vs Denmark: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Croatia
3
in 2018
Denmark
3
in 2018
Croatia rank
1st
Denmark rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Croatia
  • Denmark
11.522.53180019092018

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 3 against 3 in Denmark, a difference of 0.

Across all 88 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

Croatia ranks 1st and Denmark ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 10 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Denmark Difference Ahead
1920s 1 3 2 Denmark
1930s 1 3 2 Denmark
1940s 1 3 2 Denmark
1950s 1 3 2 Denmark
1960s 1 3 2 Denmark
1970s 1 3 2 Denmark
1980s 1 3 2 Denmark
1990s 1 3 2 Denmark
2000s 2.5 3 0.5 Denmark
2010s 3 3 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Croatia or Denmark?
Croatia, at 3 against 3 in Denmark as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Croatia and Denmark?
0, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Denmark?
88 years are reported by both, from 1921 to 2018.
How do Croatia and Denmark rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Croatia ranks 1st and Denmark ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).