Costa Rica vs Trinidad and Tobago: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Costa Rica
3
in 2018
Trinidad and Tobago
3
in 2018
Costa Rica rank
1st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
1st
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Costa Rica
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 3 against 3 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 57 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3 | 2 | 1 | Costa Rica |
| 1970s | 3 | 2 | 1 | Costa Rica |
| 1980s | 3 | 2.9 | 0.1 | Costa Rica |
| 1990s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Costa Rica or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Costa Rica, at 3 against 3 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Costa Rica and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 57 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2018.
- How do Costa Rica and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Costa Rica ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).