Democratic Republic of Congo vs Kazakhstan: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Democratic Republic of Congo
1
in 2018
Kazakhstan
1
in 2018
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
118th
Kazakhstan rank
118th
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 1 against 1 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 118th and Kazakhstan ranks 118th of 167 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Democratic Republic of Congo averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1.5 | 0.5 | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 2 | 1 | 1 | Democratic Republic of Congo |
| 2010s | 1.67 | 1 | 0.6667 | Democratic Republic of Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Democratic Republic of Congo or Kazakhstan?
- Democratic Republic of Congo, at 1 against 1 in Kazakhstan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Democratic Republic of Congo and Kazakhstan?
- 0, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Kazakhstan?
- 40 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2018.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Kazakhstan rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 118th and Kazakhstan ranks 118th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).