Congo, Dem. Rep. vs Eritrea: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Congo, Dem. Rep.
1
in 2018
Eritrea
1
in 2018
Congo, Dem. Rep. rank
117th
Eritrea rank
117th

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Congo, Dem. Rep.
  • Eritrea
00.511.52196519912018

How they compare

Congo, Dem. Rep. currently reports 1 against 1 in Eritrea, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Congo, Dem. Rep. ahead.

Congo, Dem. Rep. ranks 117th and Eritrea ranks 117th of 166 countries.

Congo, Dem. Rep. has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Dem. Rep. Eritrea Difference Ahead
2000s 2 1 1 Congo, Dem. Rep.
2010s 1.67 1 0.6667 Congo, Dem. Rep.

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Congo, Dem. Rep. or Eritrea?
Congo, Dem. Rep., at 1 against 1 in Eritrea as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Congo, Dem. Rep. and Eritrea?
0, with Congo, Dem. Rep. ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Dem. Rep. and Eritrea?
13 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.
How do Congo, Dem. Rep. and Eritrea rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Congo, Dem. Rep. ranks 117th and Eritrea ranks 117th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).