Comoros vs Fiji: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Comoros
0
in 2018
Fiji
0
in 2018
Comoros rank
150th
Fiji rank
150th

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Comoros
  • Fiji
0123197019942018

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 0 against 0 in Fiji, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Fiji ahead.

Comoros ranks 150th and Fiji ranks 150th of 166 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 2 and Fiji in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Fiji Difference Ahead
1970s 1 2 1 Fiji
1980s 1 1.4 0.4 Fiji
1990s 1.78 2.11 0.3333 Fiji
2000s 1.33 1.11 0.2222 Comoros
2010s 2.67 0 2.67 Comoros

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Comoros or Fiji?
Comoros, at 0 against 0 in Fiji as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Comoros and Fiji?
0, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Fiji?
42 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2018.
How do Comoros and Fiji rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Comoros ranks 150th and Fiji ranks 150th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).