Comoros vs Equatorial Guinea: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Comoros
0
in 2018
Equatorial Guinea
0
in 2018
Comoros rank
150th
Equatorial Guinea rank
150th
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Comoros
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 0 against 0 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Comoros ahead.
Comoros ranks 150th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 150th of 166 countries.
Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Comoros |
| 1980s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Comoros |
| 1990s | 1.78 | 0 | 1.78 | Comoros |
| 2000s | 1.2 | 0 | 1.2 | Comoros |
| 2010s | 2.67 | 0 | 2.67 | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Comoros or Equatorial Guinea?
- Comoros, at 0 against 0 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Comoros and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Equatorial Guinea?
- 43 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2018.
- How do Comoros and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Comoros ranks 150th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 150th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).