China vs Kazakhstan: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
China
1
in 2018
Kazakhstan
1
in 2018
China rank
118th
Kazakhstan rank
118th
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- China
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
China currently reports 1 against 1 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 205 shared years of data; in 1800 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
China ranks 118th and Kazakhstan ranks 118th of 167 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 22 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1800s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1810s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1820s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1830s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0.875 | 0.625 | 0.25 | China |
| 1920s | 1 | 0.8 | 0.2 | China |
| 1930s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | China |
| 2000s | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | China |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, China or Kazakhstan?
- China, at 1 against 1 in Kazakhstan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between China and Kazakhstan?
- 0, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Kazakhstan?
- 205 years are reported by both, from 1800 to 2018.
- How do China and Kazakhstan rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- China ranks 118th and Kazakhstan ranks 118th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).