Chile vs Peru: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Chile
3
in 2018
Peru
3
in 2018
Chile rank
1st
Peru rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Chile
  • Peru
0123181819182018

How they compare

Chile currently reports 3 against 3 in Peru, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 184 shared years of data; in 1821 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 1st and Peru ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Across the 20 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 9 and Peru in 8.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Peru Difference Ahead
1820s 1 1.6 0.6 Peru
1830s 1 1.5 0.5 Peru
1840s 1 0 1 Chile
1850s 1.9 0 1.9 Chile
1860s 2 0 2 Chile
1870s 2 0 2 Chile
1880s 2.25 1.5 0.75 Chile
1890s 1.2 3 1.8 Peru
1900s 1 3 2 Peru
1910s 1 3 2 Peru
1920s 1 1 0
1930s 1.71 3 1.29 Peru
1940s 2 2.4 0.4 Peru
1950s 2.2 0.8 1.4 Chile
1960s 3 2 1 Chile
1970s 1.12 0 1.12 Chile
1980s 0.2 3 2.8 Peru
1990s 2 0.6 1.4 Chile
2000s 3 3 0
2010s 3 3 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Chile or Peru?
Chile, at 3 against 3 in Peru as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Chile and Peru?
0, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Peru?
184 years are reported by both, from 1821 to 2018.
How do Chile and Peru rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Chile ranks 1st and Peru ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).