Chile vs Mongolia: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Chile
3
in 2018
Mongolia
3
in 2018
Chile rank
1st
Mongolia rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Chile
  • Mongolia
0123181819182018

How they compare

Chile currently reports 3 against 3 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 94 shared years of data; in 1925 it was Mongolia ahead.

Chile ranks 1st and Mongolia ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Across the 10 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 4 and Mongolia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Mongolia Difference Ahead
1920s 1 1 0
1930s 1.5 1 0.5 Chile
1940s 2 1 1 Chile
1950s 2.2 1 1.2 Chile
1960s 3 1 2 Chile
1970s 0.9 1 0.1 Mongolia
1980s 0.2 1 0.8 Mongolia
1990s 2 2.8 0.8 Mongolia
2000s 3 3 0
2010s 3 3 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Chile or Mongolia?
Chile, at 3 against 3 in Mongolia as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Chile and Mongolia?
0, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mongolia?
94 years are reported by both, from 1925 to 2018.
How do Chile and Mongolia rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Chile ranks 1st and Mongolia ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).