Chile vs Lesotho: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Chile
3
in 2018
Lesotho
3
in 2018
Chile rank
1st
Lesotho rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Chile
  • Lesotho
0123181819182018

How they compare

Chile currently reports 3 against 3 in Lesotho, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 1st and Lesotho ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 4 and Lesotho in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Lesotho Difference Ahead
1960s 3 2 1 Chile
1970s 0.9 0.7 0.2 Chile
1980s 0.2 1 0.8 Lesotho
1990s 2 1.4 0.6 Chile
2000s 3 2.8 0.2 Chile
2010s 3 3 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Chile or Lesotho?
Chile, at 3 against 3 in Lesotho as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Chile and Lesotho?
0, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Lesotho?
53 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2018.
How do Chile and Lesotho rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Chile ranks 1st and Lesotho ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).