Central African Republic vs Niger: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Central African Republic
2
in 2018
Niger
2
in 2018
Central African Republic rank
84th
Niger rank
84th
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Central African Republic
- Niger
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 2 against 2 in Niger, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Niger ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 84th and Niger ranks 84th of 167 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Niger in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Niger |
| 1970s | 0 | 0.4 | 0.4 | Niger |
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1.75 | 1 | 0.75 | Central African Republic |
| 2000s | 0.6 | 2.3 | 1.7 | Niger |
| 2010s | 1 | 2 | 1 | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Central African Republic or Niger?
- Central African Republic, at 2 against 2 in Niger as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Central African Republic and Niger?
- 0, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Niger?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2018.
- How do Central African Republic and Niger rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Central African Republic ranks 84th and Niger ranks 84th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).