Canada vs Ecuador: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Canada
3
in 2018
Ecuador
3
in 2018
Canada rank
1st
Ecuador rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Canada
  • Ecuador
0123183019242018

How they compare

Canada currently reports 3 against 3 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 150 shared years of data; in 1867 it was Canada ahead.

Canada ranks 1st and Ecuador ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 16 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Ecuador Difference Ahead
1860s 3 0 3 Canada
1870s 3 0 3 Canada
1880s 3 0 3 Canada
1890s 3 0 3 Canada
1900s 3 0.9 2.1 Canada
1910s 3 1 2 Canada
1920s 3 0.5 2.5 Canada
1930s 3 0 3 Canada
1940s 3 0.4 2.6 Canada
1950s 3 2 1 Canada
1960s 3 1.5 1.5 Canada
1970s 3 0.9 2.1 Canada
1980s 3 3 0
1990s 3 3 0
2000s 3 2.4 0.6 Canada
2010s 3 3 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Canada or Ecuador?
Canada, at 3 against 3 in Ecuador as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Canada and Ecuador?
0, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Ecuador?
150 years are reported by both, from 1867 to 2018.
How do Canada and Ecuador rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Canada ranks 1st and Ecuador ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).