Cameroon vs Rwanda: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Cameroon
0
in 2018
Rwanda
0
in 2018
Cameroon rank
150th
Rwanda rank
150th

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Cameroon
  • Rwanda
00.511.52196019892018

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 0 against 0 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cameroon ahead.

Cameroon ranks 150th and Rwanda ranks 150th of 166 countries.

Cameroon has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 1.56 1 0.5556 Cameroon
1970s 1 0.3 0.7 Cameroon
1980s 1 0 1 Cameroon
1990s 0.2 0 0.2 Cameroon
2000s 0 0 0
2010s 0 0 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Cameroon or Rwanda?
Cameroon, at 0 against 0 in Rwanda as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Cameroon and Rwanda?
0, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Rwanda?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2018.
How do Cameroon and Rwanda rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Cameroon ranks 150th and Rwanda ranks 150th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).