Cambodia vs Comoros: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Cambodia
0
in 2018
Comoros
0
in 2018
Cambodia rank
150th
Comoros rank
150th

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Cambodia
  • Comoros
0123195519862018

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 0 against 0 in Comoros, a difference of 0.

Across all 28 years both countries report, Comoros has been ahead every year.

Cambodia ranks 150th and Comoros ranks 150th of 166 countries.

Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Comoros Difference Ahead
1970s 0 1 1 Comoros
1990s 1 1.67 0.6667 Comoros
2000s 0 1.2 1.2 Comoros
2010s 0 2.67 2.67 Comoros

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Cambodia or Comoros?
Cambodia, at 0 against 0 in Comoros as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Cambodia and Comoros?
0, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Comoros?
28 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2018.
How do Cambodia and Comoros rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Cambodia ranks 150th and Comoros ranks 150th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).