Cape Verde vs Luxembourg: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Cape Verde
3
in 2018
Luxembourg
3
in 2018
Cape Verde rank
1st
Luxembourg rank
1st
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Cape Verde
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 3 against 3 in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.
Across all 44 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Cape Verde ranks 1st and Luxembourg ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1 | 3 | 2 | Luxembourg |
| 1980s | 1 | 3 | 2 | Luxembourg |
| 1990s | 2.8 | 3 | 0.2 | Luxembourg |
| 2000s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Cape Verde or Luxembourg?
- Cape Verde, at 3 against 3 in Luxembourg as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Cape Verde and Luxembourg?
- 0, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Luxembourg?
- 44 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2018.
- How do Cape Verde and Luxembourg rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Cape Verde ranks 1st and Luxembourg ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).