Cape Verde vs Lithuania: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Cape Verde
3
in 2018
Lithuania
3
in 2018
Cape Verde rank
1st
Lithuania rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Lithuania
11.522.53191819682018

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 3 against 3 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.

Across all 44 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.

Cape Verde ranks 1st and Lithuania ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Lithuania Difference Ahead
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 2.8 2.9 0.1 Lithuania
2000s 3 3 0 β€”
2010s 3 3 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Cape Verde or Lithuania?
Cape Verde, at 3 against 3 in Lithuania as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Cape Verde and Lithuania?
0, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Lithuania?
44 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2018.
How do Cape Verde and Lithuania rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Cape Verde ranks 1st and Lithuania ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).