Cabo Verde vs Cyprus: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Cabo Verde
3
in 2018
Cyprus
3
in 2018
Cabo Verde rank
1st
Cyprus rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Cabo Verde
  • Cyprus
11.522.53196019892018

How they compare

Cabo Verde currently reports 3 against 3 in Cyprus, a difference of 0.

Across all 44 years both countries report, Cyprus has been ahead every year.

Cabo Verde ranks 1st and Cyprus ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cabo Verde Cyprus Difference Ahead
1970s 1 3 2 Cyprus
1980s 1 3 2 Cyprus
1990s 2.8 3 0.2 Cyprus
2000s 3 3 0
2010s 3 3 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Cabo Verde or Cyprus?
Cabo Verde, at 3 against 3 in Cyprus as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Cabo Verde and Cyprus?
0, with Cabo Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Cyprus?
44 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2018.
How do Cabo Verde and Cyprus rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Cabo Verde ranks 1st and Cyprus ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).