Burundi vs Kuwait: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Burundi
1
in 2018
Kuwait
1
in 2018
Burundi rank
117th
Kuwait rank
117th

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Burundi
  • Kuwait
00.511.52196219902018

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 1 against 1 in Kuwait, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Burundi ahead.

Burundi ranks 117th and Kuwait ranks 117th of 166 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 2 and Kuwait in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Kuwait Difference Ahead
1960s 0.8571 1 0.1429 Kuwait
1970s 0 1 1 Kuwait
1980s 0 1 1 Kuwait
1990s 0 1 1 Kuwait
2000s 1.67 1 0.6667 Burundi
2010s 1.56 1 0.5556 Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Burundi or Kuwait?
Burundi, at 1 against 1 in Kuwait as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Burundi and Kuwait?
0, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Kuwait?
47 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2018.
How do Burundi and Kuwait rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Burundi ranks 117th and Kuwait ranks 117th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).