Burkina Faso vs Côte d'Ivoire: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Burkina Faso
2
in 2018
Côte d'Ivoire
2
in 2018
Burkina Faso rank
84th
Côte d'Ivoire rank
84th
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Burkina Faso
- Côte d'Ivoire
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 2 against 2 in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 84th and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 84th of 167 countries.
Côte d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Côte d'Ivoire | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.6 | 1 | 0.4 | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 1970s | 0.4444 | 1 | 0.5556 | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 1980s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 1990s | 0 | 0.9 | 0.9 | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 2000s | 0 | 2 | 2 | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 2010s | 1 | 2 | 1 | Côte d'Ivoire |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Burkina Faso or Côte d'Ivoire?
- Burkina Faso, at 2 against 2 in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Burkina Faso and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 0, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 49 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2018.
- How do Burkina Faso and Côte d'Ivoire rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Burkina Faso ranks 84th and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 84th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).