Burkina Faso vs Central African Republic: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Burkina Faso
2
in 2018
Central African Republic
2
in 2018
Burkina Faso rank
84th
Central African Republic rank
84th
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Burkina Faso
- Central African Republic
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 2 against 2 in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 84th and Central African Republic ranks 84th of 167 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Central African Republic in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Central African Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.6 | 0 | 0.6 | Burkina Faso |
| 1970s | 0.4444 | 0 | 0.4444 | Burkina Faso |
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0 | 1.4 | 1.4 | Central African Republic |
| 2000s | 0 | 0.6 | 0.6 | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Burkina Faso or Central African Republic?
- Burkina Faso, at 2 against 2 in Central African Republic as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Burkina Faso and Central African Republic?
- 0, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Central African Republic?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2018.
- How do Burkina Faso and Central African Republic rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Burkina Faso ranks 84th and Central African Republic ranks 84th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).