Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 1 against 1 in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 0.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Lao People's Democratic Republic has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 118th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 118th of 167 countries.
Lao People's Democratic Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Lao People's Democratic Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 1 | 1.86 | 0.8571 | Lao People's Democratic Republic |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 1 against 1 in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 1991.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1953 to 1991.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 118th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 118th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).