Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Jordan: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1
in 1991
Jordan
1
in 2018
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
118th
Jordan rank
118th
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Jordan
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 1 against 1 in Jordan, a difference of 0.
Across all 44 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 118th and Jordan ranks 118th of 167 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1 | 1.12 | 0.125 | Jordan |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Jordan?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 1 against 1 in Jordan as of 1991.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Jordan?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Jordan?
- 44 years are reported by both, from 1946 to 1991.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Jordan rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 118th and Jordan ranks 118th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).