Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Burundi: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1
in 1991
Burundi
1
in 2018
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
118th
Burundi rank
118th
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Burundi
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 1 against 1 in Burundi, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Burundi ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 118th and Burundi ranks 118th of 167 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Burundi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1 | 0.875 | 0.125 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 1970s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 1980s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 1990s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Burundi?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 1 against 1 in Burundi as of 1991.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Burundi?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Burundi?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1991.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Burundi rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 118th and Burundi ranks 118th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).