Benin vs Mexico: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Benin
3
in 2018
Mexico
3
in 2018
Benin rank
1st
Mexico rank
1st

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Benin
  • Mexico
0123182219202018

How they compare

Benin currently reports 3 against 3 in Mexico, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Benin ahead.

Benin ranks 1st and Mexico ranks 1st of 166 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Benin averaged higher in 2 and Mexico in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Benin Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 1.12 1 0.125 Benin
1970s 0.2 1 0.8 Mexico
1980s 0 1 1 Mexico
1990s 2 1.67 0.3333 Benin
2000s 2.4 3 0.6 Mexico
2010s 3 3 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Benin or Mexico?
Benin, at 3 against 3 in Mexico as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Benin and Mexico?
0, with Benin ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Mexico?
56 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2018.
How do Benin and Mexico rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Benin ranks 1st and Mexico ranks 1st of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).