Benin vs Malaysia: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Benin
3
in 2018
Malaysia
3
in 2018
Benin rank
1st
Malaysia rank
1st
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Benin
- Malaysia
How they compare
Benin currently reports 3 against 3 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Malaysia ahead.
Benin ranks 1st and Malaysia ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Benin averaged higher in 1 and Malaysia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.12 | 2.88 | 1.75 | Malaysia |
| 1970s | 0.2 | 2 | 1.8 | Malaysia |
| 1980s | 0 | 2 | 2 | Malaysia |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2.4 | 2.2 | 0.2 | Benin |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Benin or Malaysia?
- Benin, at 3 against 3 in Malaysia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Benin and Malaysia?
- 0, with Benin ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Malaysia?
- 56 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2018.
- How do Benin and Malaysia rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Benin ranks 1st and Malaysia ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).