Belgium vs Poland: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Belgium
3
in 2018
Poland
3
in 2018
Belgium rank
1st
Poland rank
1st
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Belgium
- Poland
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 3 against 3 in Poland, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 93 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Poland ahead.
Belgium ranks 1st and Poland ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 7 and Poland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 2 | 3 | 1 | Poland |
| 1920s | 2 | 2.2 | 0.2 | Poland |
| 1930s | 2 | 1 | 1 | Belgium |
| 1940s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Belgium |
| 1950s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Belgium |
| 1960s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Belgium |
| 1970s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Belgium |
| 1980s | 3 | 1.1 | 1.9 | Belgium |
| 1990s | 3 | 2.9 | 0.1 | Belgium |
| 2000s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 3 | 3 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Belgium or Poland?
- Belgium, at 3 against 3 in Poland as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Belgium and Poland?
- 0, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Poland?
- 93 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2018.
- How do Belgium and Poland rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Belgium ranks 1st and Poland ranks 1st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).