Belarus vs Cuba: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Belarus
1
in 2018
Cuba
1
in 2018
Belarus rank
117th
Cuba rank
117th
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Belarus
- Cuba
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 1 against 1 in Cuba, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 111 shared years of data; in 1902 it was Cuba ahead.
Belarus ranks 117th and Cuba ranks 117th of 166 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 5 and Cuba in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 1 | 3 | 2 | Cuba |
| 1910s | 0.7 | 3 | 2.3 | Cuba |
| 1920s | 0.8 | 3 | 2.2 | Cuba |
| 1930s | 1 | 3 | 2 | Cuba |
| 1940s | 1 | 3 | 2 | Cuba |
| 1950s | 1 | 1.67 | 0.6667 | Cuba |
| 1960s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Belarus |
| 1970s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Belarus |
| 1980s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Belarus |
| 1990s | 1.8 | 0 | 1.8 | Belarus |
| 2000s | 1 | 0.4 | 0.6 | Belarus |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Belarus or Cuba?
- Belarus, at 1 against 1 in Cuba as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Belarus and Cuba?
- 0, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Cuba?
- 111 years are reported by both, from 1902 to 2018.
- How do Belarus and Cuba rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Belarus ranks 117th and Cuba ranks 117th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).